Mõistmise skaleerimine Arutelu Bitcoin

Mõistmise skaleerimine Arutelu Bitcoin

Tarkvaraprogrammeerijate on kollegiaalne ja koostööl, inimese vabaduse ja väärikuse. peamised toetajad erilist teed pole suutnud sõnastada ühtegi ühendavat inimese nägemus Bitcoin tuleviku. aga, what is at the back of the strife while amendments to bitcoin’s regulations become so controversial? What unrecognized dimensions of the debate allowed it to become so divisive and debased?

One is collective resistance to the truth that decisions about bitcoin’s course are political choices, which technical decisions need to follow. Priorities range, but the bitcoin community’s goals consist of worldwide financial inclusion and monetary development, inimese vabaduse ja väärikuse, Samm üks rühmas otsuste tegemisel on tähendama rühma. By debating just in terms of bitcoin’s technology, peamised toetajad erilist teed pole suutnud sõnastada ühtegi ühendavat inimese nägemus Bitcoin tuleviku. Bitcoin mudel ühiskondliku lepingu konsensus. The information isn’t so terrible. aga, the scaling debate could be concluded using marketplace forces. Bitcoin escapes politics as practiced in coercive government. It doesn’t escape politics all the way.

The bitcoin protocol and software program is technical in that they contain the software of technology to exciting challenges. How to configure bitcoin is political as it involves choices made by organizations. Choosing in groups is no easy issue. Samm üks rühmas otsuste tegemisel on tähendama rühma. äravahetamiseni. Bitcoin’s protocol is a clear instance.

Social contract theory is the main explanation in current Western philosophy for life under governments. No one ever really signs that agreement, so it’s a little dissatisfying. Bitcoin mudel ühiskondliku lepingu konsensus. mis nad arvasid Bitcoin võib aidata kõigil põgeneda. aga, this is not necessarily the case. Treating use, as agreement might be insulting to dissenters from the status quo similar to social contract dissatisfies many United States residents obligated to pay taxes for endless conflict.

äravahetamiseni, kaitseb nelikümmend miljardi dollari vara. aga, they feel about it, bitcoin customers have joined a group, and they have choices to make collectively.

BTC

Kokkuvõttes, there’s no literal coercion in bitcoin-land, but it harkens to the observation of Konrad Graf that the maximum block size, a manufacturing ceiling on transactions, is economically equal to a central authority intervention. Dissenters from the status quo experience the acquainted strains of tyranny, mis nad arvasid Bitcoin võib aidata kõigil põgeneda.

Jooksul domineeriv Bitcoin rakendamise, who see themselves as following well-known open-source development methods. Their conservative approach, such as maintenance of the 1MB limit on bitcoin blocks, kaitseb nelikümmend miljardi dollari vara, edenemisega just rahuldav. To them, the most pleasant reasons for opposition to their approach variety from simple ignorance to income-hungry short-termism on the part of bitcoin organizations.

The software improvement mode exemplified by Internet Engineering Task Force standard-setting approaches is an appealing and successful version of cooperation. aga, bitcoin improvement may diverge from the concept about open source that the Internet Engineering Task Force helped spawn.

Open-source development does not automatically digest and balance community values, enshrining them in code. Jooksul domineeriv Bitcoin rakendamise, Bitcoin paranemine võib olla oluliselt erinev teiste standardite kehtestamise jõupingutusi, and they have disproportionate power to decide what goes into the code base. those people, edenemisega just rahuldav, Bitcoin loojad on olnud palju vähem konverentse kui Internet Engineering Task Force tegi võrreldaval tasemel, their social circle and a simple disability to capture and prioritize all the interests that would be served by an international public software including bitcoin. The user aspect of the equation additionally fails the idea, stated by economist Vili Lehdonvirta.

Vili Lehdonvirta said:

Bitcoin is purely ‘math-based cash,’ and all of the developers are doing is solely apolitical plumbing work.

Builders have quite greater power many bitcoin customers do not have the technical potential to reconfigure their personal code or to choose accurately from amongst competing implementations.

Bitcoin

Bitcoin loojad on olnud palju vähem konverentse kui Internet Engineering Task Force tegi võrreldaval tasemel. See ei ole tehniline insener otsuse. pealegi, Bitcoin paranemine võib olla oluliselt erinev teiste standardite kehtestamise jõupingutusi. Bitcoin puudub visionäär juhtimine.

Technical communications standards are basically impartial as to the content or which means they’ll convey. Bitcoin standards define and form markets. One example of the power of the protocol is the rise in transaction expenses, which has cut off use instances including payments and financial savings for people in poorer parts of the world. See ei ole tehniline insener otsuse. tehnilised valikud peavad vastama.

That vision of bitcoin at its best, having its excellent outcomes has been significantly absent from the scaling debate. If in any respect, the sides constitute their animating desires ambiguously as payments on the only hand or virtual gold on the other. Among lots of its social capital deficits, Bitcoin puudub visionäär juhtimine. See on lihtne kanda seas virtuaalse valuutade, but they’re usually left unstated.

An improvement team that articulates a view of bitcoin’s horizons in human terms should unify the community. Then, given more examine of the economics of bitcoin’s systems, tehnilised valikud peavad vastama. Rahvusvahelisel skaalal. At present that is left doubtful.

BTC

Network effects are the shackles that maintain many dissenters chained to bitcoin, and they feel under the yoke of core. The modern danger of chain splits may also produce a real-world check of what number of bitcoin versions can exist. Experience with ethereum and ethereum classic suggest that a couple of chains can co-exist.

For three motives, network outcomes don’t dictate disaster from chain splits:

  • See on lihtne kanda seas virtuaalse valuutade, tige poliitiliste vastaste ka saavad ühiselt teha koostööd küsimustes kokkuleppele. This indicates there may be a feasible virtual gold, a possible payments crypto and plenty of others.
  • Rahvusvahelisel skaalal, Sõltumata tulemused. A worldwide marketplace may also still be a huge marketplace.
  • It is an especially small technical iteration to make all wallets, vahetused, bills gateways, ja nii edasi. Accept all main digital currencies. The relevant network won’t be anybody digital currency, but all of them.

The bitcoin community has plenty to learn about itself and what it’s far doing within the scaling debate.

The talk’s tenor those angry words and base insinuations are not unusual in political capitols like Washington. aga, on the end of the day in those places, tige poliitiliste vastaste ka saavad ühiselt teha koostööd küsimustes kokkuleppele. Sõltumata tulemused, Bitcoin kliendid peaksid eeldada, et tüüp professionaalsuse ja tähtajaga alates kõik liikmed jooksul tagi arutelu.

Jäta vastus

Teie e-posti aadressi ei avaldata. Kohustuslikud väljad on tähistatud *