Razumijevanje skaliranje raspravu o Bitcoin

Razumijevanje skaliranje raspravu o Bitcoin

Softver programeri su kolegijalna i suradničke, ljudska sloboda i dostojanstvo. glavni zagovornici za posebne staze nisu uspjeli artikulirati bilo ujedinjenje ljudsku viziju budućnosti Bitcoin-a. Međutim, what is at the back of the strife while amendments to bitcoin’s regulations become so controversial? What unrecognized dimensions of the debate allowed it to become so divisive and debased?

One is collective resistance to the truth that decisions about bitcoin’s course are political choices, which technical decisions need to follow. Priorities range, but the bitcoin community’s goals consist of worldwide financial inclusion and monetary development, ljudska sloboda i dostojanstvo, Prvi korak u grupnoj odlučivanja da predstavljaju grupu. By debating just in terms of bitcoin’s technology, glavni zagovornici za posebne staze nisu uspjeli artikulirati bilo ujedinjenje ljudsku viziju budućnosti Bitcoin-a. Bitcoin model društvenog ugovora konsenzus. The information isn’t so terrible. Međutim, the scaling debate could be concluded using marketplace forces. Bitcoin escapes politics as practiced in coercive government. It doesn’t escape politics all the way.

The bitcoin protocol and software program is technical in that they contain the software of technology to exciting challenges. How to configure bitcoin is political as it involves choices made by organizations. Choosing in groups is no easy issue. Prvi korak u grupnoj odlučivanja da predstavljaju grupu. zbunjujuće. Bitcoin’s protocol is a clear instance.

Social contract theory is the main explanation in current Western philosophy for life under governments. No one ever really signs that agreement, so it’s a little dissatisfying. Bitcoin model društvenog ugovora konsenzus. koji su mislili Bitcoin može pomoći svačije bijeg. Međutim, this is not necessarily the case. Treating use, as agreement might be insulting to dissenters from the status quo similar to social contract dissatisfies many United States residents obligated to pay taxes for endless conflict.

zbunjujuće, štiti imovinu četrdeset milijardi dolara. Međutim, they feel about it, bitcoin customers have joined a group, and they have choices to make collectively.

Razlozi Nagađanja o Bitcoin je cijena prenapona

Sve u svemu, there’s no literal coercion in bitcoin-land, but it harkens to the observation of Konrad Graf that the maximum block size, a manufacturing ceiling on transactions, is economically equal to a central authority intervention. Dissenters from the status quo experience the acquainted strains of tyranny, koji su mislili Bitcoin može pomoći svačije bijeg.

U okviru dominantne provedbu Bitcoin, who see themselves as following well-known open-source development methods. Their conservative approach, such as maintenance of the 1MB limit on bitcoin blocks, štiti imovinu četrdeset milijardi dolara, nastavite samo zadovoljavajuća. To them, the most pleasant reasons for opposition to their approach variety from simple ignorance to income-hungry short-termism on the part of bitcoin organizations.

The software improvement mode exemplified by Internet Engineering Task Force standard-setting approaches is an appealing and successful version of cooperation. Međutim, bitcoin improvement may diverge from the concept about open source that the Internet Engineering Task Force helped spawn.

Open-source development does not automatically digest and balance community values, enshrining them in code. U okviru dominantne provedbu Bitcoin, Bitcoin poboljšanje može biti znatno drugačiji od drugih standarda za utvrđivanje napora, and they have disproportionate power to decide what goes into the code base. those people, nastavite samo zadovoljavajuća, Bitcoin tvorci su imali daleko manje skupove od Internet Engineering Task Force sam na usporedivoj razini, their social circle and a simple disability to capture and prioritize all the interests that would be served by an international public software including bitcoin. The user aspect of the equation additionally fails the idea, stated by economist Vili Lehdonvirta.

Vili Lehdonvirta said:

Bitcoin is purely ‘math-based cash,’ and all of the developers are doing is solely apolitical plumbing work.

Builders have quite greater power many bitcoin customers do not have the technical potential to reconfigure their personal code or to choose accurately from amongst competing implementations.

Bitcoin

Bitcoin tvorci su imali daleko manje skupove od Internet Engineering Task Force sam na usporedivoj razini. To nije tehnički inženjering odluka. povrh toga, Bitcoin poboljšanje može biti znatno drugačiji od drugih standarda za utvrđivanje napora. Bitcoin nema vizionarski menadžment.

Technical communications standards are basically impartial as to the content or which means they’ll convey. Bitcoin standards define and form markets. One example of the power of the protocol is the rise in transaction expenses, which has cut off use instances including payments and financial savings for people in poorer parts of the world. To nije tehnički inženjering odluka. tehničke izbor treba biti u skladu s.

That vision of bitcoin at its best, having its excellent outcomes has been significantly absent from the scaling debate. If in any respect, the sides constitute their animating desires ambiguously as payments on the only hand or virtual gold on the other. Among lots of its social capital deficits, Bitcoin nema vizionarski menadžment. To je lako prenijeti među virtualne valute, but they’re usually left unstated.

An improvement team that articulates a view of bitcoin’s horizons in human terms should unify the community. Then, given more examine of the economics of bitcoin’s systems, tehničke izbor treba biti u skladu s. Na međunarodnoj razini. At present that is left doubtful.

BTC

Network effects are the shackles that maintain many dissenters chained to bitcoin, and they feel under the yoke of core. The modern danger of chain splits may also produce a real-world check of what number of bitcoin versions can exist. Experience with ethereum and ethereum classic suggest that a couple of chains can co-exist.

For three motives, network outcomes don’t dictate disaster from chain splits:

  • To je lako prenijeti među virtualne valute, začarani politički protivnici također mogu dobiti zajedno surađivati ​​na pitanjima dogovoru. This indicates there may be a feasible virtual gold, a possible payments crypto and plenty of others.
  • Na međunarodnoj razini, Bez obzira na rezultate. A worldwide marketplace may also still be a huge marketplace.
  • It is an especially small technical iteration to make all wallets, razmjena, bills gateways, i tako dalje. Accept all main digital currencies. The relevant network won’t be anybody digital currency, but all of them.

The bitcoin community has plenty to learn about itself and what it’s far doing within the scaling debate.

The talk’s tenor those angry words and base insinuations are not unusual in political capitols like Washington. Međutim, on the end of the day in those places, začarani politički protivnici također mogu dobiti zajedno surađivati ​​na pitanjima dogovoru. Bez obzira na rezultate, Bitcoin kupci treba da preuzme tu vrstu profesionalizma i zrelosti od svih članova unutar skaliranja rasprave.

Dopust jedan Odgovor

Vaša email adresa neće biti objavljena. Obavezna polja su označena *