Is Ripple a Wolf in Sheep’s Clothing?

Is Ripple a Wolf in Sheep’s Clothing?

Digital currency purists have usually judged new coins by some essential elements. On top of the list has continually been decentralization. However, one of the bigger coins within the digital currency marketplace has been hiding in plain sight with its centralized nature. However, its latest increase that saw it finish remaining year as one of top performing digital assets has seen it garner plenty of hate.

Ripple, a token created by the organization of the equal name that targets to facilitate transfers among main economic organizations. In this aim, it has visible much success over 2017 with some main banks collaborating with it. In spite of operating with central banks, the centralized nature has many up in arms. Whilst the system was created in 2013, the development group eliminated the various key functions you find in most part of other different digital currencies. This was accomplished in so that the token could be geared toward these main economic establishments, which is great and possibly important, but it becomes complicated while Ripple is counted within the same breath as Bitcoin and different decentralized digital currencies. Ripple problems its token in a centralized fashion, not like other digital currencies that are mined and incentivized by people dedicating computing power to accumulate them.

Wolf in Sheep’s Clothing

Many within the community, including creators of other digital currencies, have slammed Ripple’s definition as a digital currency.

A moderator of the Bitcoin subreddit, Reddit user thieflar, said:

“For the maximum part, I’m not frustrated or angry with Ripple, I’m frustrated with the community’s general lack of knowledge nowadays (i.e., Ripple is a symptom, but not the problem itself). The truth that Ripple is labeled as a digital currency and included on websites like CoinMarketCap has been, for the most part, seen as misleading and inaccurate for many years now.”

Litecoin author, Charlie Lee, has mentioned that he does not believe that Ripple should even be taken into consideration as a digital currency.

Charlie Lee posted in Twitter on September 9:

“R3 sues Ripple for $1B. Option to shop for 5B XRPs?! Circulation supply is just 38B. 🤦‍♂️ XRP isn’t a digital -forex.”

In addition, Joseph Young posted in Twitter on May 17:

“Ripple is locking up $14 billion of its native currency to control its price?

Locking funds, itself is bad. The reason is even worse.”


In spite of the mixed opinions of Ripple, it nonetheless made huge gains in 2017, going up 36000 percent. This led to it’s marketplace capitalization to push the coin up to second on Coinmarketcap for a period. However, even this accolade has been slammed.

Thieflar also noted:

“It looks like the multiple-year-long digital currency bull-marketplace ultimately reached a point in which beginners have been shopping for indiscriminately, not understanding anything about what they’re shopping for aside from it’s a digital coin so you can make money with it, and Ripple controlled to get caught up within the madness.”

Apparently, Ripple itself agrees that it should not be sold indiscriminately to try to make money off the gains.

As their gateway guide said:

“Private exchanges and liquidity companies may choose to keep additional XRP for trading. Ripple (the organization) does not sell XRP as a speculative investment.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *