Block Grootte van 1MB is voor vandaag Bitcoin

Block Grootte van 1MB is voor vandaag Bitcoin

Ariel Desch Apell is momenteel content manager voor Ubitquity, a block chain properties commissioning and recently Henry Hazlitt Fellowship held at the Foundation for Economic Education. In this opinion piece, Desch Apell argued the current ceiling for Bitcoin transactions are not likely to be the technology to violate the long-term acceptance, and that more creative solutions should be given priority. Bitcoin can be found in an interesting, misschien zelfs doorslaggevende, moment.

Als onderdeel van de EU-referendum in Groot-Brittannië of “Proposed referendum on United Kingdom membership of the European Union”, many financial agencies torecognize bitcoin increasingly credible role as a safe haven asset taken. Institutional investors such as Daniel Masters begin to signal, it could be ready for prime time, and the market capitalization is around 10 billion according to a recent series of floats of profits. But as its price and investment prospects to improve, is a question hangs over the remote network behind the digital currency: Kan het schaal adoptie afdrukken recht aan? At it is current development path, waarin iemand niet denken.

The technology behind Bitcoin is the block chain called. The blocks that are about confirmed every 10 minutes all previous transactions in the Bitcoin network, and are currently at 1MB of information a block capped.
The problem? Average block sizes tend closer to this limit and some suggest it already, push excess transactions in the following block. Consequently,there are times of the delayed acknowledgment times and higher transaction fees, the anxious feeling that many have in the room. Als gevolg, the question of how Bitcoin scale is currently the most controversial in the room.

While Bitcoin Core developers have a plan, gelooft dat een luidruchtige minderheid meer onmiddellijke actie nodig is. De komende maanden zullen verstevigen die aanpak wordt gevolgd, it is important to examine whether the immediate action is required for bitcoin further success.

How should scale Bitcoin?

The dream of Bitcoin evangelist is to end for the currency one day the global patchwork of sovereign fiat currencies and carry out his most importantmeans all transactions.These are ambitious goals, and also have a chance to reach them, Bitcoin moet eerst op te lossen zijn zeer reële technische beperkingen. Terwijl Bitcoin een klei, inelasticcurrency, the truth is that the connected payment network currently does not even support a fraction of a fraction of today’s global transactions.

Take only the Visa network, bijvoorbeeld, de 47,000 Hit tips transactions per second on its network during the 2013 holiday. Compared to this single centralized payment processor can process only a handful of transactions per second, the Bitcoin protocol. Obviously to achieveits ambitious goals, Bitcoin needs to improve its transaction throughput by an order of magnitude. The easiest way to increase this number is, the powerto increase 1MB cap on the block size. Het is ook de slechtste manier om het te doen.

Als ontwikkelaar, Joseph Poon en Tadge Dryja schreef in haar Witboek over Bitcoin betalingskanalen:

If we use an average of 300 bytes per Bitcoin transaction as unlimited block sizes, an associated capacity Visa transaction volume of 47,000 tps to tipwould be almost 8 GB per Bitcoin block, elk 10 minutes on average. Continuously, that would be about 400 terabytes of data per year. These dramatic figures tell us that increasing the block size alone is a non-starter bitcoin as a long-term plan for scaling.

Any increase creates more centralized printing on the backbone of the network: miners and nodes. Without a robust distributed network is bitcoin vulnerable to censorship and attacks. To put it differently, in order to increase the block size is to make a conscious compromise between decentralizationand performance.

But bitcoin decentralization is the largest single feature as underpinned its immutability, en weerstand tegen censuur. Without these features is bitcoin simply reduced to a to be very cumbersome and expensive PayPal. If so can bitcoin instead, are then scaled a certain degree of decentralization without, so this is clearly the path to be taken. Om deze reden, kunnen we op lange termijn scaling oplossingen die de kern aanpakken van het probleem nodig.

Het netwerk, zoals het nu is, kan niet effectief schaal. daarom, de manier waarop het netwerk werkt zelf moet worden geoptimaliseerd, en bouwt. The optimization comes from upgrades such Segregated witness who blocked the way process transactions optimized and enhanced to increase efficiency without block size. SegWit laying on the foundations for future upgrades that adds right to Bitcoin and dramatically increase its transaction throughput. These are concepts like the lightning network and the side chains, which can be found elsewhere in detail.

Is not that a 1MB cap violate assumption?

onderworpen Zelfs met Segregated Witness testen en diverse top-level protocol implementaties in ontwikkeling, er zijn een paar, het probleem is urgent, get blocks are full now. The argument usually goes like this: When blocks near capacity transaction times slowly and fees, get higher. These problems mean less accepting and less acceptance means a faltering network effect and bitcoin dying. Therefore we need a hardfork for an immediate increase in the capacity to at least 2 MB to increase the block size, while longer term solutions are developed.

But increasing the block size even slightly still carries with it security risks and remains a cumbersome way bitcoin time scale. Seen in this light, de enige reden voor een hardfork is te duwen wanneer het eigenlijk dat voller 1MB blokken kunnen worden getoond en aanzienlijk hinderen korte- tot middellange termijn aanvaarding. They do not do that. Fuller average blocks mean higher fees, en als deze kosten niet zijn vervuld, dan ja, it will slow down confirmation be times in the network.

From Bitcoin Evangelist perspective, it is easy to see how this assumption could hurt. A consumer for the first time with Bitcoin and for a retail store in aserious confirmation delay is executed, could very well received by the technology off overrated that does not work exactly as advertised. And it is this kind of smaller transactions, the full blocks disproportionately. The problem is that this scenario is still largely a dream.

Bitcoin years away just enough of that for the average consumer to purchase on their mobile phone, gebruik het als een serieus alternatief voor iets als Apple Pay of zelfs Venmo. De waarheid is Bitcoin is al absoluut verschrikkelijk voor deze toepassingen. Dat is gewoon niet komen in de huidige groei. De reden is simpel, maar krachtig: de volatiliteit.

For day to day living and spending, not the average consumer in their right mind goes to a greatly fluctuating currency set when a is far more stable and is accepted readily at hand. As the mainstream media is to be realized, is current growth of the lion’s share of Bitcoin is undoubtedly as an investment and speculative vehicle. These types of transactions are to be much larger in the rule in value than the retail. This is correlated with the numbers at Trade Block available that can show us that the average bitcoin transaction between May 27 and June 25 at 12 was 14 en BTC, veel groter dan elke denkbare aankoop in de winkel.

Here does not immediately lost credit card transactions and stable purchasing power Bitcoin. It must beat only traditional bank transfers and wires, dat is drie tot vijf werkdagen om kosten berekend voor een absurde gemakkelijke taak zal blijven, and comparable investment performance elsewhere. As is bitcoin a proven and sought after investment goods, haar marktkapitalisatie zal groeien. Volatiliteit is waarschijnlijk daardoor te verminderen, is to make it gradually more suitable for applications of the average consumer.


This is made if reliable, snel en goedkoop microtransacties veel belangrijker voor groei. Maar dat zal niet gebeuren in de komende maanden. Het is zelfs niet door de tijd met succes zal gebeuren, lightning network implementation and probably not for a while afterwards. That’s because the patchwork of fiat currencies ends a very long process. True Bitcoin evangelists are in it for the long haul. The evangelists who violate full believe blocks or can even kill bitcoin adoption in the short term do not see the forest for the trees. Ze willen de Bitcoin valuta door de massa geaccepteerd om te zien, en een fout in de veronderstelling dat de eerste fase van de groei draait op deze massale adoptie.

in werkelijkheid, zelfs zonder netwerk throughput een probleem, we zijn nog zo ver weg van deze. De massa's worden niet Bitcoin groei die nog steeds actief. Beleggers en speculanten nog steeds dat zware werk te doen, and the system will continue to work very well for them, even if blocks are temporarily fuller. Block size will eventually come increases, maar ze een zeer klein deel van de schaal vergelijking. Hardforking is nothing to address us now except the illusion of progress and additional problems for Bitcoin Core developers.

Blokketting schaalbaarheid is geen eenvoudige oplossing. Het is slechts met een langzame, steady and creative problem solving and development that it be addressed. While the foundation is laid, there is little reason and no evidence that the adoption will be immediately hampered by a continued 1MB block size.

laat een antwoord achter

Uw e-mailadres wordt niet gepubliceerd. Verplichte velden zijn gemarkeerd *